Lying is a complex behavior that can be influenced by cognitive functions in different ways. Each of Carl Jung’s eight cognitive functions would approach deception based on its orientation (introverted/extraverted) and domain (thinking, feeling, sensing, intuition).
Introverted vs. Extraverted Lying
- Introverted functions (Ni, Si, Ti, Fi) lie in a more internalized way—by reinterpreting, omitting, or rationalizing.
- Extraverted functions (Ne, Se, Te, Fe) lie in a more externalized way—by improvising, exaggerating, or manipulating social perception.
Thinking Functions (Ti & Te) – Lies of Logic & Systems
Introverted Thinking (Ti) – Lying by Technicality
- How? Ti lies through selective logic, omitting key details, or bending definitions to technically remain “true.”
- Example: A Ti user might manipulate wording to maintain plausible deniability (e.g., “I never said that exact thing”).
- Justification: Lies are “true” within their internal framework, even if misleading externally.
Extraverted Thinking (Te) – Lying for Efficiency
- How? Te lies by creating false but effective systems, manipulating statistics, or crafting authoritative-sounding misinformation.
- Example: A Te user might inflate performance numbers to appear more competent or tell a quick white lie to avoid inefficiency.
- Justification: If a lie achieves a tangible result, it may be considered justified.
Feeling Functions (Fi & Fe) – Lies of Emotion & Values
Introverted Feeling (Fi) – Lying by Emotional Truth
- How? Fi lies through self-deception, reframing memories, or presenting an emotionally preferable version of reality.
- Example: A Fi user might tell themselves they never loved someone to avoid emotional pain.
- Justification: If a lie aligns with internal values or emotional truth, it feels acceptable.
Extraverted Feeling (Fe) – Lying for Harmony
- How? Fe lies by managing social perception, sugarcoating, or omitting harsh truths to maintain harmony.
- Example: Saying “I love your gift!” even if they dislike it.
- Justification: If it protects relationships or avoids social conflict, it is justified.
Intuition Functions (Ni & Ne) – Lies of Perception & Possibility
Introverted Intuition (Ni) – Lying through Vision & Conviction
- How? Ni lies by strategically shaping narratives, distorting meaning, or leading others to a predetermined conclusion.
- Example: A Ni user might selectively reveal certain truths to subtly push someone toward an intended belief.
- Justification: If the deception leads to a “greater truth” or long-term vision, it is acceptable.
Extraverted Intuition (Ne) – Lying through Exaggeration & Improvisation
- How? Ne lies by spinning possibilities, creating plausible but false scenarios, or embellishing details spontaneously.
- Example: A Ne user might invent an entertaining but false anecdote in conversation.
- Justification: If the lie is creative, fun, or stimulates possibilities, it doesn’t feel like true deception.
Sensing Functions (Si & Se) – Lies of Experience & Perception
Introverted Sensing (Si) – Lying by Memory Distortion
- How? Si lies by unconsciously altering memories, exaggerating past experiences, or selectively recalling events.
- Example: A Si user might genuinely believe a false version of an event due to biased memory recall.
- Justification: If the lie aligns with their personal experience or past framework, it feels true.
Extraverted Sensing (Se) – Lying through Performance & Presence
- How? Se lies by confidently fabricating in the moment, using body language to sell deception, or living in the illusion they create.
- Example: A Se user might bluff convincingly in a high-stakes situation.
- Justification: If the lie enhances the experience or serves an immediate goal, it is acceptable.
Conclusion: The Nature of Lies in Cognitive Functions
- Ti/Te manipulate facts and logic.
- Fi/Fe manipulate emotions and social harmony.
- Ni/Ne manipulate narratives and possibilities.
- Si/Se manipulate perception and sensory reality.
***